Implementation Process
The decision-making process related to CFSP is complex. Before explaining it, it is useful to briefly introduce the different bodies involved in the procedure.​
​
-
European Council: The European Council, made up of heads of state or government and chaired by a full-time president, sets the political orientation and priorities of the EU’s work.
-
Council of Europe Union (the Council): The Council of the EU, made up of representatives of the member states and, in most cases, chaired by representative of the member state that holds the six-month rotating presidency, negotiates, and adopts EU legislation and coordinates policies. The ministers have the authority to commit their governments to the actions agreed upon in the meetings. Together with the European Parliament, the Council and the Parliament are the main decision-making bodies the EU.
-
The European Parliament: The European Parliament is the EU's law-making body. It is directly elected by EU voters every 5 years. The parliament has three main roles: Legislative, supervisory, and budgetary
-
The European Commission: The European Commission is the EU's politically independent executive arm. It is responsible for drawing up proposals for new European legislation, and it implements the decisions of the European Parliament and the Council of the EU.
-
Committees and Working Groups: smaller groups of experts in a subject matter set up by the Council to help and coordinate the Council's activities in different areas. Some committees/working groups are:
-
Working Party of Foreign Relations Counsellors (RELEX)
-
Political and Security Committee
-
Committee of Permanent Representatives (COREPE)
-
​
It is also important to keep in mind that decisions related to CFSP should be taken unanimously. In other words, one member of the Council has the e ability to block a decision. After the Lisbon Treaty there are only a few sensitive topics that require a unanimous vote and CFSP is one of them. This, however, may change in the near future as there are currently discussions around changing the decision-making system to a qualified majority voting system in specific areas of the CFSP notably sanctions.
​
The illustration below shows the various steps for the implementation of a Decision and Regulations in the EU:
First Step
Proposal for a Council Decision made by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy with the support of the Commission in general (or alternatively by a Member State)
Fifth Step
The Council of the European Union takes a decision
Second Step
The proposal will be announced at Foreign Affaires Council followed by examinations by the relevant Council preparatory bodies
(e.g. the Council working party responsible for the geographical region to which the targeted country belongs, and the Political and Security Committee)
Sixth Step
Council informing the European Parliament of the adoption of the Council's decision
Third Step
An agreed-upon package (by consensus) will be sent to the Working Party of Foreign Relations Counsellors Working Party or RELEX (There is a sanctions formation within RELEX which works on decisions implying restrictive measures)
Seventh Step
If the Council Decision requires EU Regulation to be implemented (e.g. financial sanctions), EU Parliament will pass the necessary Regulation (Measures laid down only in the CFSP decision, such as arms embargoes or travel restrictions, will be implemented by the member states, while the Commission will verify that the member states have implemented the regulations in a proper and timely manner.)
Fourth Step
After examining the package, RELEX submits the terms of the proposed restrictive measures to COREPER II for final scrutiny before the Council's decision.
Eighth Step
The Decision and Regulation come into force upon publication in the Official Journal of the European Union
Depending on the type of the restrictive measure, it might be necessary to have legislation at the Member States' level. In fact, similar to a federal government, the EU has certain legislative competencies. If a restrictive measure in a CFSP Decision falls outside of those competencies, then it is up to the Member States' governments to pass those measures domestically. For example, travel bans and arms embargoes require Member States' actions to be effective. Yet, other restrictive measures like financial and trade sanctions fall within the competence of the EU. In this latter case, considering the direct effect of the European law principle, the EU Parliament, in line with the Council Decision, passes a set of regulations to implement the restrictive measures in question throughout the Union. (That is why you will see a regulation along with Council decision in various sanctions regimes.)
​
Finally, as stated in the 2024 Update of the EU Best Practices for the effective implementation of restrictive measures, sanctions regulations require that Member States to adopt legislation providing for penalties for breaching restrictive measures. In 2024, the European Parliament and of the Council adopted "Directive (EU) 2024/1226 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on the definition of criminal offenses and penalties for the violation of Union restrictive measures and amending Directive (EU) 2018/1673." The directive required each member state to pass domestic laws to criminalize violations of the EU sanctions in line with the minimum punishments proscribed in the directive.
​